Validating Pre- and Postconditions with USE

OCL provides special syntax for specifying pre- and postconditions on operations in a UML model. Pre- and postconditions are constraints that define a contract that an implementation of the operation has to fulfill. A precondition must hold when an operation is called, a postcondition must be true when the operation returns. The USE tool allows to validate pre- and postconditions by simulating operation calls. The following describes how this feature works.

Contents:

1. Example Model
2. Adding Pre- and Postconditions
3. Validating the Model
3.1 Initial State
3.2 Calling Operations and Checking Preconditions
3.3 Operation Effects
3.4 Exiting Operations and Checking Postconditions
3.5 Result Values and References to the Previous State
3.6 Visualization as Sequence Diagram
4. An Example with oclIsNew
5. Nested Operation Calls

Back to the USE home page.

1. Example Model

Consider the following UML class diagram for a simple model with persons that can work for a company.

class diagram

Here is the USE specification of the model shown in the class diagram that we use in the sequel.

model Employee

-- classes

class Person
attributes
  name : String
  age : Integer
  salary : Real
operations
  raiseSalary(rate : Real) : Real
end

class Company
attributes
  name : String
  location : String
operations
  hire(p : Person)
  fire(p : Person)
end

-- associations

association WorksFor between
  Person[*] role employee
  Company[0..1] role employer
end

2. Adding Pre- and Postconditions

We add pre- and postconditions for the hire and fire operations in class Company. The USE specification is extended as follows.

-- constraints

constraints

context Company::hire(p : Person)
  pre  hirePre1: p.isDefined()
  pre  hirePre2: employee->excludes(p)
  post hirePost: employee->includes(p)

context Company::fire(p : Person)
  pre  firePre:  employee->includes(p)
  post firePost: employee->excludes(p)

The first precondition of the hire operation is named hirePre1 and makes sure that the operation can only be called with a well-defined person object (Note that the operation isDefined is a USE extension. It is not possible to express this constraint with standard OCL). The second precondition (hirePre2) makes sure that the person passed as parameter p is not already an employee of the company. The postcondition (hirePost) guarantees that after the operation has exited, the person actually has been added to the set of employees. The constraints for the operation fire work just the other way round.

3. Validating the Model

3.1 Initial State

Now let's test the pre- and postconditions. First we start the USE tool with the specification of the example model.

$ use Employee.use
use version 1.6.0, Copyright (C) 1999,2000,2001 Mark Richters
use> 

At the prompt, we enter the following commands to create two objects.

use> !create ibm : Company
use> !create joe : Person
use> !set joe.name := 'Joe'
use> !set joe.age := 23

The current system state can be visualized with an object diagram view in USE (click on the picture to get an enlarged version).

screenshot

Next, we want to call the operation hire on the company object to hire joe as a new employee.

3.2 Calling Operations and Checking Preconditions

Operation calls are initiated with the command openter. The syntax is

!openter <source-expression> <operation-name> ( [<argument-expression-list>] )

where <source-expression> must be an OCL expression denoting the receiver object of the operation named <operation-name>. Depending on the operation's signature an <argument-expression-list> has to be passed to the operation.

The following command shows the top-level bindings of variables. These variables can be used in expressions to refer to existing objects.

use> info vars
ibm : Company = @ibm
joe : Person = @joe

We invoke the operation hire on the receiver object ibm and pass the object joe as parameter.

use> !openter ibm hire(joe)
precondition `hirePre1' is true
precondition `hirePre2' is true

The openter command has the following effect.

  1. The source expression is evaluated to determine the receiver object.
  2. The argument expressions are evaluated.
  3. The variable self is bound to the receiver object and the argument values are bound to the formal parameters of the operation. These bindings determine the local scope of the operation.
  4. All preconditions specified for the operation are evaluated.
  5. If all preconditions are satisfied, the current system state is saved and the operation call is saved on a call stack.

In the example, the call of the operation hire was successful because both preconditions are satisfied. The stack of currently active operations can be viewed by issuing the following command.

use> info opstack
active operations: 
1. Company::hire(p : Person)

We can verify the bindings of the self variable and the formal parameter p as follows.

use> info vars
ibm : Company = @ibm
joe : Person = @joe
p : Person = @joe
self : Company = @ibm

3.3 Operation Effects

We can simulate the execution of an operation with the usual USE primitives for changing a system state. The postcondition of the hire operation requires that a WorksFor link between the person and the company has to be created. We also set the salary of the new employee.

use> !insert (p, ibm) into WorksFor
use> !set p.salary := 2000

The object diagram shows the new system state with the link between the person and company objects.

screenshot

3.4 Exiting Operations and Checking Postconditions

After generating all side-effects of an operation, we are ready to exit the operation and check its postconditions. The command opexit simulates a return from the currently active operation. The syntax is

!opexit [<result-expression>]

The optional <result-expression> is only required for operations with a result value. An example will be given later. The operation hire specifies no result, so we can just issue

use> !opexit
postcondition `hirePost' is true

The opexit command has the following effect.

  1. The currently active operation is popped from the call stack.
  2. If an optional result value is given, it is bound to the special OCL variable "result".
  3. All postconditions specified for the operation are evaluated in context of the current system state and the pre-state saved at operation entry time.
  4. All local variable bindings are removed.

In our example, the postcondition hirePost is satisfied.

The operation has been removed from the call stack.

use> info opstack
no active operations.

All variable bindings local to operations are removed on exit.

use> info vars
ibm : Company = @ibm
joe : Person = @joe

Note that object names are elements of the top-level bindings. If you create new objects inside an operation call, their names will still be available after exiting the operation.

3.5 Result Values and References to the Previous State

The operation raiseSalary in class Person is used for changing the salary of an employee by a given rate. The following constraints are added to the model specification.

context Person::raiseSalary(rate : Real) : Real
  post raiseSalaryPost: 
    salary = salary@pre * (1.0 + rate)
  post resultPost:
    result = salary

The first postcondition raiseSalaryPost requires that the new value of the salary attribute equals a value that is computed in terms of the previous value using the @pre modifier. The second postcondition resultPost specifies that the result value of the operation equals the new salary.

We call raiseSalary on the new employee joe. The rate 0.1 is given to raise the salary by 10%.

use> !openter joe raiseSalary(0.1)

The salary attribute is assigned a new value with the set command.

use> !set self.salary := self.salary + self.salary * rate

Since raiseSalary is an operation with a return value, we have to specify a result value on exit. This value is bound to the OCL result variable when the postconditions are evaluated.

use> !opexit 2200
postcondition `raiseSalaryPost' is true
postcondition `resultPost' is true

3.6 Visualization as Sequence Diagram

The USE tool can visualize a sequence of operation calls as a UML sequence diagram. The following screenshot shows the sequence of calls for the example. During a validation session the diagram is automatically updated on each operation call.

screenshot

4. An Example with oclIsNew

Here is another example modeling a graph structure. Objects of class Node represent nodes of a graph that can be connected by edges. Each node can be connected to an arbitrary number of source and target nodes. The Node class contains an operation newTarget(). The purpose of this operation is to (1) create a new node and (2) to insert a new edge between the source node and the new target node.

model Graph

class Node
operations
  newTarget()
end

association Edge between
  Node[*] role source
  Node[*] role target
end

constraints

context Node::newTarget()
  -- the operation must link exactly one target node
  post oneNewTarget: 
    (target - target@pre)->size() = 1 

  -- the target node must not exist before
  post targetNodeIsNew: 
    (target - target@pre)->forAll(n | n.oclIsNew())

The postcondition targetNodeIsNew also demonstrates the application of the OCL operation oclIsNew to check for the creation of new objects.

We use the following command script for animating the model. The script simulates three operation calls. The first one is expected to succeed while the second and third one should violate the postconditions.

!create n1 : Node

-- this call satisfies both postconditions
!openter n1 newTarget()
!create n2 : Node
!insert (n1,n2) into Edge
!opexit

-- postcondition oneNewTarget fails, 
-- because n3 is not linked to n1
!openter n1 newTarget()
!create n3 : Node
!opexit

-- postcondition targetNodeIsNew fails, 
-- because n3 has already been created above
!openter n1 newTarget()
!insert (n1,n3) into Edge
!opexit

Here is the output of the USE tool confirming our expectations about the success and failure of postconditions. Details during the evaluation of failing postconditions provide hints about what went wrong.

$ use -nogui Graph.use Graph.cmd
use version 1.6.0, Copyright (C) 1999,2000,2001 Mark Richters
Graph.cmd> !create n1 : Node
Graph.cmd> 
Graph.cmd> -- this call satisfies both postconditions
Graph.cmd> !openter n1 newTarget()
Graph.cmd> !create n2 : Node
Graph.cmd> !insert (n1,n2) into Edge
Graph.cmd> !opexit
postcondition `oneNewTarget' is true
postcondition `targetNodeIsNew' is true
Graph.cmd> 
Graph.cmd> -- postcondition oneNewTarget fails, 
Graph.cmd> -- because n3 is not linked to n1
Graph.cmd> !openter n1 newTarget()
Graph.cmd> !create n3 : Node
Graph.cmd> !opexit
postcondition `oneNewTarget' is false
evaluation results:
  self : Node = @n1
  self.target : Set(Node) = Set{@n2}
  self : Node = @n1
  self.target@pre : Set(Node) = Set{@n2}
  (self.target - self.target@pre) : Set(Node) = Set{}
  (self.target - self.target@pre)->size : Integer = 0
  1 : Integer = 1
  ((self.target - self.target@pre)->size = 1) : Boolean = false
postcondition `targetNodeIsNew' is true
Graph.cmd> 
Graph.cmd> -- postcondition targetNodeIsNew fails, 
Graph.cmd> -- because n3 has already been created above
Graph.cmd> !openter n1 newTarget()
Graph.cmd> !insert (n1,n3) into Edge
Graph.cmd> !opexit
postcondition `oneNewTarget' is true
postcondition `targetNodeIsNew' is false
evaluation results:
  self : Node = @n1
  self.target : Set(Node) = Set{@n2,@n3}
  self : Node = @n1
  self.target@pre : Set(Node) = Set{@n2}
  (self.target - self.target@pre) : Set(Node) = Set{@n3}
  n : Node = @n3
  n.oclIsNew : Boolean = false
  (self.target - self.target@pre)->forAll(n : Node | n.oclIsNew) : Boolean = false
Graph.cmd> 

The screenshot below shows the sequence diagram automatically generated from the example. Dashed return arrows in red indicate that a postcondition failed on exit from an operation call.

screenshot

5. Nested Operation Calls

This example shows how operation calls may be nested in the simulation. It also shows that postconditions may be specified on operations without side-effects. An OCL expression can be given to describe the computation of a side-effect free operation. In the example, we use a recursive definition of the factorial function.

model NestedOperationCalls

class Rec
operations
  fac(n : Integer) : Integer =
    if n <= 1 then 1 else n * self.fac(n - 1) endif
end

constraints

context Rec::fac(n : Integer) : Integer
  pre:  n > 0
  post: result = n * fac(n - 1)

The postcondition reflects the inductive case of the definition of the factorial function. The following commands show the computation of 3!.

use> !create r : Rec
use> !openter r fac(3)
precondition `pre1' is true
use> !openter r fac(2)
precondition `pre1' is true
use> !openter r fac(1)
precondition `pre1' is true

The call stack now looks like this.

use> info opstack
active operations: 
1. Rec::fac(n : Integer) : Integer
2. Rec::fac(n : Integer) : Integer
3. Rec::fac(n : Integer) : Integer

We exit the operations in reverse order and provide result values that satisfy the postcondition.

use> !opexit 1
postcondition `post1' is true
use> !opexit 2
postcondition `post1' is true
use> !opexit 6
postcondition `post1' is true

The screenshot below shows the sequence diagram automatically generated from the example. Note the stacked activation frames resulting from the recursion.

screenshot

Back to the USE home page.


Home|People|Teaching|Publications
Last change: 17.04.2008 by Fabian Buettner (green@informatik.uni-bremen.de)